FOX NEWS, FOX AND FRIENDS, GLADLY REPORTS THAT MUSK HAS EXPOSED THE DEMOCRATS HAD A DIRECT LINE TO TWITTER WHICH THE DEMOCRATS USED TO UNDERMINE THEIR POLITICAL OPPONENTS 

BUT FOX IGNORES THAT MY LAWSUIT AGAINST THEM HAS EXPOSED THAT REPUBLICANS HAD A DIRECT LINE TO FOX WHICH REPUBLICANS USED TO UNDERMINE THEIR POLITICAL OPPONENTS. 

REPUBLICAN HOUSE REPRESENTATIVE JACKSON SAID ON FOX AND FRIENDS SATURDAY THEY (DEMOCRATS) COULD JUST CALL TWITTER AND HAVE ANYONE THEY OPPOSED BLOCKED.

JACKSON ALSO SAID THAT THE DEMOCRATS DIRECT LINE TO TWITTER IS A GREATER THREAT TO AMERICAN DEMOCRACY THAN OUR OVERSEAS THREATS.

JACKSON WENT ON TO SAY THAT HERE  “WE HAVE OUR OWN FBI AND OUR PRESIDENT WORKING WITH TWITTER TO UNDERMINE THEIR POLITICAL OPPONENTS”

JACKSON SAID THIS DIRECT LINE BY THE DEMOCRATS TO TWITTER IS SOVIET ERA TYPE STUFF.   

WATCH THE BELOW ONE MINUTE VIDEO TO SEE THAT OUR FORMER PRESIDENT AND REPUBLICAN AINO McCONNELL HAVE A DIRECT LINE TO FOX TO UNDERMINE THEIR POLITICAL OPPONENTS.

FOX WILL ARGUE IN COURT ON WEDNESDAY THIS WEEK THAT CALLING ME A CONVICTED FELON IS “SUBSTANTIALLY TRUE” AND THEY SIMPLY MADE A MISTAKE. BUT IF  “SUBSTANTIALLY TRUE” WHY DOES FOX ARGUE IT IS WAS JUST A MISTAKE. 

FOX WILL ARGUE THAT MURDOCH’S EMAIL TO FOX EXECUTIVES SAYING DUMPING ON ME HARD MIGHT SAVE THE DAY WAS NOT A DIRECTIVE TO REPEATEDLY CALL ME A FELON THE NEXT DAY.  IT JUST HAPPENED BY CHANCE FOX WILL SAY.

YES, I AGREE WITH JACKSON THAT THIS IS SOVIET UNION ERA STUFF AND THAT  IT IS A GREATER THREAT TO OUR FREEDOMS THAN IS CHINA AND RUSSIA TROLLING ON SOCIAL MEDIA.  

IT IS INDISPUTABLE THAT FOX IS ACTUALLY A GREATER THREAT TO OUR FREEDOMS THAN TWITTER.  WISH MUSK HAD BOUGHT THEM. 

IN MY CASE IT IS NOT JUST THE FBI, THE PRESIDENT, THE REPUBLICAN PARTY LEADERS AND FOX THAT UNDERMINED MY CANDIDACY IT HAS THUS FAR ALSO INCLUDED THE AMERICAN JUDICIARY AND THE AMERICAN CONGRESS 

ALL OF THIS MAY BECOME WORSE THAN SOVIET UNION ERA STUFF IF IT IS NOT STOPPED. 

IT MAY BECOME NAZI GERMANY ERA STUFF WHEREIN THE GERMAN JUDICIARY UPHELD THE RIGHT TO PERSECUTE THE JEWS BECAUSE THE GOVERNMENT HAD MADE IT LEGAL TO DO SO.

THE U.S. GOVERNMENT CLAIMS TO HAVE MADE IT LEGAL TO DEFAME ME BECAUSE I AM A PUBLIC FIGURE.  CAN SOMEONE SHOW ME IN THE CONSTITUTION WHERE A PUBLIC FIGURE HAS LESS RIGHTS UNDER THE LAW THAN ANYONE ELSE?  

Share.